Improving surface hygiene in a neonatal unit

Posted

30th November 2020

Research

A study on improving surface hygiene in a South African neonatal unit. Results showed a multi-modal intervention including the implementation of Clinell Universal disinfectant wipes improved surface hygiene.

The South African preprint study reports the impact of a bundle of measures to improve surface hygiene in a neonatal unit in a resource limited setting.

What did the intervention consist of?

The intervention consisting of the implementation of disinfectant wipes, training, audit and feedback, and cleaning checklists resulted in reductions in bacterial contamination, and improvements in cleaning thoroughness (as measured by ATP and fluorescent marker removal).

Where did the study take place?

The study took place in a 30-bed neonatal unit within a large hospital in Cape Town, South Africa.

What was the routine cleaning prior to the intervention?

Prior to the intervention, routine cleaning of the unit was done using detergent and cloths, with 70% alcohol used for disinfection for patients undergoing transmission-based precautions.

The key elements

The key elements of the multi-modal intervention were training of nursing staff regarding surface/equipment cleaning, introduction of customised cleaning checklists, cleaning audits with staff feedback, use of in-room disinfectant wipes (Clinell Universal), and involvement of neonates’ mothers with cleaning of the patient zone.

Intervention icons

How was the impact measured?

The impact of the intervention was measured by surface sampling, and the use of ATP measurement and fluorescent marker removal.

Results

The proportion of surfaces from which no potential neonatal pathogen was cultured increased over the study period (from 49% at baseline to 69% at the end of the study, p=0.007). The proportion of surfaces and equipment meeting the “cleanliness” ATP threshold (<200 RLU) increased over time (from 40% at baseline to 65% at the end of the study, p=0.002). The rate of UV mark removal following cleaning increased over time (from 23% at baseline to 74% at the end of the study, p<0.001).

UV mark removal

What were the findings?

The findings of this study suggest that surface hygiene on the unit was sub-optimal at baseline. A multi-modal intervention including the implementation of disinfectant wipes, markedly improved surface hygiene on the unit. Whilst healthcare-associated infections were not reported, the improvements in surface hygiene would have resulted in higher levels of protection for this extremely vulnerable patient group.

For more of our latest research, take a look at our latest articles and filter the category by "Research". Spread the word and share this article on social.

Share this article

Tags

Latest News

Research
Asymptomatic transmission blog.jpg

Is asymptomatic transmission the major driver of t…

In this week's research article, we discuss whether asymptomatic …

Company news
Richard McMahon-Banner-01.jpg

Welcoming our new Chief Quality and Regulatory Off…

We sat down virtually with GAMA Healthcare's new Chief Quality an…

Research
coronavirus

The SARS-CoV-2 variant: a briefing

Recently, it has become clear that a new variant of SARS-CoV-2 (t…

Research
blog-banner-cleaning_2-01.jpg

How to clean your home to prevent the spread of CO…

Due to the new strain of the COVID-19 virus, many of us are facin…

Research
22.12.2020-HSE-Guidance-3.jpg

Creating a COVID-secure workplace: new guidance fr…

Employers need to create a COVID-secure workplace. With some indu…

Research
What you need to know about the UK’s COVID-19 vaccine_2.jpg

What you need to know about the UK’s COVID-19 vacc…

With the UK rolling out the new COVID-19 vaccine, we've put toget…

Research
Products-Training-header.jpg

Our survey says: 86% of nurses know that Clinell w…

Earlier this year, we conducted a survey on GAMA Healthcare’s Cli…